The Vernacular Press Act of 1878: A Colonial Clampdown on Freedom of Expression
The Vernacular Press Act was an ordinance introduced by the British colonial government of India to suppress dissent and control the vernacular or native language press. A set of exhaustive points detailing the history background of the act, reasons for introducing, implications both short term and long-term, reactions, and their effects are provided below.
Historical Background of the Vernacular Press Act, 1878
Colonial Background:-
As the 19th century went on, British supremacy in India became further entrenched and direct British rule replaced the rule of the British East India Company that had dominated India since 1858, following the Indian Rebellion of 1857.
Press Freedom Issues:-
The English language journals had much more freedom under the British regime, while non-English speaking audiences were catered to by vernacular presses that started vociferously protesting the colonial rule.
Vernacular Press:-
Vernaculars gained wings during the latter half of the 19th century when the nationalist sentiments began to be expressed with the emergence of journals in the 1860s and 1870s.
Early Legislation Trials:-
The colonial government, before the Vernacular Press Act, used the Act of 1835, Press and the Registration Act of 1867 as a precursor to curb the vernacular press.
Why the Vernacular Press Act Was Passed
Rising Opposition Against British Rule:-
Post-1857 Mutiny, British administrators were extremely alert about all that could create hostility against them. Vernacular press had become an even more powerful medium to communicate with the mass audience against British policies.
Emergence of Muslim Reformist Movements:-
The Wahhabi movement was another form of Muslim reformist movements which opposed the British and desired to reinstate Islamic rule. This has caused the colonial government agitated.
Vernacular Press Movement:-
Vernacular newspapers began to flourish in Bengali, Marathi and Urdu. They criticized British economic policy, land revenue system and administrative decisions which precipitated poverty and oppression.
Lord Lytton, the then Viceroy of India, was keen to stifle dissent in India, which encountered a spate of severe famine and economic decay during the 1870s. He believed that the onslaught of public criticism became unbearable and pressed for legal measures that would gag the press.
The Necessities of the Vernacular Press Act
Targeted the Vernacular Press:-
The Act was directed squarely at newspapers and their periodicals in vernacular languages alone and careful to avoid touching English newspapers.
Power of Censorship:-
The Act empowered district magistrates to inspect any vernacular publication and decide whether it carried “seditious” material.
Ban on Printing and Distribution:-
District Judges were given the powers to prohibit the printing and publishing of any vernacular newspaper if they believed that the same incited a cataclysm or the criticism of British government exceeded the limit of tolerable.
No right to appeal:-
No provision existed to appeal against the magistrate’s ruling. This is to say that a publication could be shut down legally, and its owners were not entitled to appeal to the courts.
Deposit of securities:-
Vernacular publishers had to deposit some securities that would be forfeited in case they published “seditious” material. Offenders who committed this crime more than once could have their fines increased or have some of press equipment confiscated.
The Real Direct Effect of the Act on Vernacular Press
Closure of Newspapers:-
There were countless vernacular newspapers and other forms of publication which either shut down in anticipation of prosecution or could not pay the fines levied on them.
Self-Censorship:-
Many vernacular newspapers started censoring themselves, fearing that their newspaper may be closed or their proprietors and editors subjected to hefty fines and so a more prudish and restricted press emerged.
Emergence of Subterranean Press:-
Others published behind the scenes or sub-terra, merely to evade the British censorship but still continued publishing anti-colonialist material at a great risk to their persons.
Reactions and Counter Measures of the Act
Indian Nationalist Reaction:-
The politicians, thinkers, and freedom fighters were thoroughly hurt as the Vernacular Press Act was one such extreme violation of the rights of speech and a discriminatory measure that targeted native language publications alone.
Criticism from the English Language Newspapers:-
Not directly being affected, some criticism towards the act had come through newspapers in the English language, which generally opposed the act for targeting vernacular presses disproportionately.
International Reaction:-
The act drew high detestation from around the world too. There were severe condemnations by the human rights defenders in Britain and many other countries for being repressive and unreasonable.
Consolidation of Nationalist Movement:-
Ironically enough the Vernacular Press Act now formed an element of unity among these varied groups of nationalists who viewed the act as fresh evidence of British oppression and voiced protest against such colonial repression with redoubled zeal .
Action Heroic Leaders in the Struggle against the Act
Surendranath Banerjee:-
He was an influential nationalist and freedom fighter who used his newspaper, The Bengalee to protest against this act and emerged as one of the leading opponents of British attempts to gag the press.
Dadabhai Naoroji:-
He exploited this opportunity to challenge the very existence of the act from both Indian and British soil also by bringing out the British liberal sentiments regarding its discriminatory nature.
Prominent Writers and Journalists:-
Most of the journalists, writers, and social reformers of India used to write against the act though discreetly not explicitly in order to bypass the watchful eye of the authorities in order to keep the spark of the dissent in the air.
Importance of Vernacular Press Act
Major Landmark of Colonial Control:-
The Vernacular Press Act was a landmark in the British government’s bid to consolidate their stranglehold over India through suppressing any potential source of rebellion or dissent against them .
Restraint to Free Expression:-
This act is often referred to as one of the earliest instances of colonial control and censorship over free speech and expression in India.
Denoting Discrimination:-
This act considered vernacular works but still mainly focused on the English language works as “acceptable” only in Indian people’s hands, with vernacular works forming somewhat of a threat.
Awakening National Consciousness:-
This act in itself was a turning point for the Indian nationalist movement, where a majority of the linguistics and regional people started realizing that they needed a joint response against colonial oppression.
Repeal of Vernacular Press Act
Change in British Policy:-
The British government softened their attitude towards the press after the departure of Lord Lytton in 1880 and enforced the law gradually stop.
Role of Lord Ripon:-
Lord Ripon, who succeeded Lytton as Viceregent, along with tremendous pressure from various quarters, revoked the Vernacular Press Act in 1882.
Symbolic victory to Indian Press:-
The act was a quite significant victory to the Indian press and the early nationalist movement that granted more freedom to vernacular publications .
Legacy of the Vernacular Press Act
Gigantic step for freedom of the press:-
This act laid the foundation for future struggles for press freedom in India as Indian nationalists realized that a free press was vital to the movement for independence.
Since the act was repealed but inspired the later colonial legislation, to mention but a few, such as the Press Act of 1910 and the Indian Press (Emergency Powers) Act of 1931, the long-term influence on journalism in India was settling the demand for robust journalism that posed a challenge to Indian newspapers to seek excellent ways of speaking under worse circumstances.
Historically, it would be a good lesson on repression and resistance:-
the vernacular press act shows that authoritarian policies can sometimes backfire by strengthening the very forces they intend to suppress through making a stronger spirit of resistance and unity among the oppressed.
Conclusion:-
Catalyst to Nationalism:-
The Vernacular Press Act of 1878 lives on in the pages of history as a catalyst that hastened the Indian nationalist movement, wherein multiple regional voices came together to create a common enemy.
Oppressive Symbol of Colonialism:-
The act is also an oppressive symbol of colonialism, representing how far the British government was willing to go to keep Indian dissent at bay and maintain control in the country.
So untouched by this thorny legislation, the Indian vernacular press’s courage brought courage in modern Indian journalists, reminding the world of the efficacy of free speech and press in challenging not-so-great persons in power.
Conclusion The Vernacular Press Act of 1878, as a law, served the colonial interests of repression-but in the process paradoxically worked in an opposite way; it created strong, long-lasting forms of press culture and inflamed nationalist sentiment everywhere in India.
Also Read:- The Demand for Pakistan: A Detailed Analysis (1500 Words)